Project Apex: An In-Depth Analysis of the Landmark Leveraged Buyout of Electronic Arts

Executive Summary

The global interactive entertainment industry is being reshaped by a transaction of historic scale and complexity: the $55 billion all-cash leveraged buyout (LBO) of Electronic Arts (EA). This deal, the largest of its kind on record, will see the iconic video game publisher taken private by a strategically assembled consortium comprising Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), the veteran technology investment firm Silver Lake Partners, and Affinity Partners, a private equity firm founded by Jared Kushner.1 The acquisition represents a monumental wager on the long-term value of premier interactive entertainment intellectual property.

At its core, the transaction is a multifaceted event. From a financial perspective, it is a logical, if audacious, move within a consolidating industry, providing EA with a perceived shield from the short-term pressures of public markets. Strategically, it is the capstone of Saudi Arabia’s multi-billion-dollar campaign to become a dominant force in the global gaming sector. However, the deal is simultaneously fraught with profound geopolitical, ethical, and cultural controversies. The central thesis of this report is that the acquisition of Electronic Arts is a watershed moment, representing not just a massive financial transaction, but a complex convergence of sovereign wealth, political influence, and cultural soft power. The implications of this deal will have lasting and transformative repercussions for the operational strategy of Electronic Arts, the creative direction of its beloved franchises, and the broader landscape of the global gaming industry.

Deconstructing the Deal: The Financial Architecture of a Megabuyout

The acquisition of Electronic Arts is defined by its record-breaking scale and the sophisticated financial engineering used to execute it. A granular analysis of the deal’s structure reveals the consortium’s aggressive valuation and the significant financial pressures the company will face under its new ownership.

Valuation and Premium

The consortium’s offer places an enterprise value of approximately $55 billion on Electronic Arts.1 The transaction is structured as an all-cash offer to EA stockholders at a price of $210 per share.2 This valuation is significant not only for its absolute size but also for the substantial premium it represents. The $210 per share price reflects a 25% premium over EA’s unaffected share price of $168.32 on September 25, 2025, the last trading day before news of the negotiations began to circulate. Furthermore, it represents a premium over EA’s all-time high share price of $179.01, recorded in August 2025.5 This aggressive pricing strategy underscores the consortium’s determination to secure the asset and preempt any potential competing bids.

Sources and Uses of Funds

The financing for this megabuyout is a blend of substantial equity contributions and a landmark debt package. The deal will be funded by approximately $36 billion in equity from the consortium partners and a colossal $20 billion in debt financing fully committed by JPMorgan Chase.1 A critical component of the equity structure is the decision by the PIF to roll over its existing 9.9% stake in EA, which it had been accumulating prior to the buyout announcement.1 This move signals PIF’s long-term commitment and reduces the amount of new cash required from the partners. To secure the agreement, the terms also include a $1 billion break-up fee, payable under certain conditions if the deal fails to close, highlighting the high stakes involved.1

The LBO Mechanism and Its Implications

Crucially, this transaction is a leveraged buyout, meaning a significant portion of the purchase price is financed with borrowed money. The debt taken on to finance the acquisition—the $20 billion provided by JPMorgan Chase—will ultimately become the responsibility of Electronic Arts itself, with the company’s assets serving as collateral.12 While the consortium and EA’s leadership have framed the move to go private as a way to escape the short-term pressures of quarterly earnings reports and focus on long-term, innovative projects, the LBO structure introduces a powerful counter-pressure.1 Instead of being liberated from financial scrutiny, EA will now be beholden to its new private equity owners and its creditors, who will require substantial and consistent cash flow to service this immense debt load. This financial reality creates a fundamental contradiction with the public narrative of creative freedom. The most probable strategic path for EA will not be one of creative risk-taking but rather a doubling-down on its most reliable and predictable revenue streams, such as the live-service models in games like

Apex Legends and the annual releases of its dominant sports franchises.13 The financial architecture of the deal itself suggests a future governed by the need for cash-flow optimization over speculative innovation.

Timeline and Approvals

The agreement has been formally approved by Electronic Arts’ Board of Directors.6 The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of fiscal year 2027, which corresponds to the spring or summer of 2026.1 This timeline is contingent upon receiving customary approvals from both EA’s shareholders and relevant national security and antitrust regulators.6 Upon successful completion, Electronic Arts’ 36-year history as a publicly traded company will conclude, and its stock will be delisted from the NASDAQ exchange.5

MetricValueSource(s)
Total Enterprise Value~$55 billion1
Price Per Share$210 (all-cash)2
Premium to Unaffected Share Price25%1
Total Equity Contribution~$36 billion1
PIF Rollover Stake9.9%6
Total Debt Financing$20 billion1
Lead Debt FinancerJPMorgan Chase1
Break-up Fee$1 billion1
Expected Closing DateQ1 Fiscal Year 20271

The Consortium: Profiling the New Custodians of Electronic Arts

The acquiring consortium is not a monolithic entity but a symbiotic partnership, with each member contributing a distinct and critical component to the deal’s viability. Understanding the individual profiles and strategic objectives of PIF, Affinity Partners, and Silver Lake is essential to grasping the transaction’s underlying dynamics.

3.1 The Financial Engine: Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF)

The Public Investment Fund is the primary financial power behind the acquisition. As one of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, with assets exceeding $925 billion, PIF is the main vehicle for realizing Saudi Arabia’s “Vision 2030,” a national strategy to diversify the kingdom’s economy away from its dependence on oil.16 Controlled by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), PIF has identified the global gaming industry as a key pillar of this diversification effort.16

Through its dedicated subsidiary, Savvy Games Group, PIF has executed an aggressive, multi-billion-dollar investment campaign to establish a commanding presence in the sector.16 This includes acquiring significant minority stakes in industry giants like Nintendo, Capcom, and Take-Two Interactive, as well as the complete buyouts of esports behemoth ESL FACEIT Group and mobile publisher Scopely.2 The acquisition of Electronic Arts is the unambiguous crown jewel of this strategy, described by analysts as PIF’s “biggest such move to date by some distance”.2 As the lead capital provider, PIF’s role is to fuel what its Deputy Governor Turqi Alnowaiser calls EA’s “long-term growth, while fueling innovation within the industry on a global scale”.6

3.2 The Political Catalyst: Jared Kushner and Affinity Partners

Jared Kushner’s Affinity Partners brings a different, though no less critical, asset to the consortium: political capital. Kushner, a real estate heir and former senior advisor to President Donald Trump, founded the Miami-based private equity firm in 2021.7 The firm’s financial foundation is deeply intertwined with the Gulf, most notably through a controversial $2 billion investment from PIF received shortly after Kushner’s departure from the White House.16 This relationship has drawn scrutiny, including an inquiry from the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance over concerns that Affinity’s investors may be motivated more by the pursuit of political influence than by purely commercial returns.13

Within the consortium, Kushner’s role is not that of a gaming industry expert but of a “bridge builder”.18 His cultivated personal relationship with MBS and his extensive political network in the United States are invaluable for aligning the consortium’s interests and, crucially, for navigating the complex regulatory approval process.8 His public statements have framed his involvement in personal terms, expressing excitement as a lifelong fan of EA’s games who now enjoys them with his children.2

3.3 The Silicon Valley Veteran: Silver Lake’s Strategic Play

Silver Lake provides the operational and technological credibility essential for an acquisition of this magnitude. As a premier global technology investment firm, Silver Lake has a distinguished track record of executing successful large-scale, take-private transactions, including the landmark buyouts of Skype and Dell.9 Their involvement signals to the market that the new ownership structure will be managed with seasoned expertise.

Furthermore, Silver Lake’s existing portfolio demonstrates clear strategic synergies with EA’s core business. The firm holds investments in sports through its majority stake in City Football Group, the parent company of Manchester City F.C., and in gaming technology through its investment in the game development engine Unity.9 This deep sector experience allows Silver Lake to provide credible oversight and strategic guidance. Co-CEO Egon Durban’s statement that the firm will “invest heavily to grow the business” reinforces Silver Lake’s role as the experienced operational steward in the partnership.9

The consortium, therefore, is not a partnership of equals but a highly strategic, symbiotic arrangement. Each member provides a critical component the others lack: PIF supplies the overwhelming financial power, Silver Lake lends the operational credibility, and Kushner offers the political connections. This division of labor reveals the deal’s true nature as a sophisticated fusion of capital, credibility, and connections designed to acquire a premier cultural asset while navigating significant political and regulatory hurdles.

The Target: Why Electronic Arts, Why Now?

The decision to acquire Electronic Arts at this moment is a calculated move based on the company’s unique position as an industry titan facing significant headwinds, making it a prime target for a take-private transaction.

An Iconic but Stagnant Giant

Founded in 1982 and a public company since 1989, Electronic Arts is a foundational pillar of the modern video game industry.1 Its portfolio contains some of the world’s most recognized and durable intellectual properties (IP), including the military shooter franchise

Battlefield, the life-simulation series The Sims, and the dominant sports titles EA Sports FC and Madden NFL.1 This collection of “iconic” IP generates consistent revenue and provides a stable platform for future growth. However, despite the strength of its brands, the company has struggled with top-line growth. For the past three fiscal years, EA’s annual revenues have remained largely flat, hovering in the $7.4 billion to $7.6 billion range, signaling a potential performance plateau.2

Industry Headwinds

The acquisition is taking place against the backdrop of a broader slowdown in the $178 billion global video games market. After experiencing a significant boom during the pandemic, the industry is now grappling with slower growth, forcing many publishers to cut staff and scale back projects.1 Concurrently, competition has intensified dramatically. Microsoft’s nearly $69 billion acquisition of rival Activision Blizzard has reshaped the competitive landscape, while the proliferation of free-to-play mobile games from companies like Epic Games has captured significant market share.12 For an established giant like EA, this environment makes bold, transformative investments both more necessary and more difficult to justify to public shareholders.

The Rationale for Going Private

The primary strategic justification for the buyout is to provide EA with a “safe harbor” from the relentless scrutiny of the public markets.1 Operating as a private company, under the continued leadership of CEO Andrew Wilson, would theoretically free the management team from the pressure of meeting quarterly earnings expectations.5 This would allow them to “retool operations” and pursue “long-term growth opportunities that may have been viewed as too risky or expensive as a public company”.2 However, this narrative presents a paradox. The move is framed as a bold step toward a more innovative future, yet it is predicated on a financial structure—the LBO—that demands intense, short-term cash generation to service its debt. Furthermore, the board’s decision to accept the offer at a price some analysts consider a discount, particularly just before the highly anticipated and potentially lucrative launch of

Battlefield 6, suggests a corporate mindset that may be more risk-averse than the “long-term vision” rhetoric implies. In essence, EA is not escaping pressure; it is trading the distributed pressure of thousands of public shareholders for the highly concentrated pressure of its new private owners and creditors.

Analyst Disagreement

The deal has elicited a divided response from market analysts, reflecting the central tension in EA’s valuation. On one side, analysts like Mike Hickey of The Benchmark Company argue that the $210 per share offer “falls materially short of the company’s intrinsic value”.2 Hickey points to the imminent launch of Battlefield 6 and a product pipeline that could add billions in new revenue, suggesting that EA’s board prioritized “near-term certainty” over maximizing long-term shareholder value. Conversely, other analysts contend that the offer is fair, given the company’s stagnant revenue growth and the fact that the reliable success of its sports franchises is already priced into the stock. From this perspective, the acquisition provides essential capital and strategic flexibility that EA needs to evolve and compete effectively in the changing market.2

The Geopolitical Chessboard: Influence, Regulation, and Conflicts of Interest

This acquisition transcends a typical corporate transaction, entering the complex arena of international politics, soft power, and potential conflicts of interest. The identities of the key players in the consortium place the deal directly on the geopolitical chessboard.

“Games-Washing” and Soft Power

The involvement of Saudi Arabia’s PIF has led to widespread accusations that the deal is a prime example of “games-washing”.13 This term, adapted from “sportswashing,” refers to the practice of using high-profile investments in popular entertainment sectors like gaming and esports to distract from and improve a country’s international image. For Saudi Arabia, a nation frequently criticized for its human rights record—including the state-ordered assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi and its restrictive laws concerning women’s and LGBTQ+ rights—owning a cultural institution like Electronic Arts offers an unparalleled platform for projecting soft power and normalizing its global standing.7

The Kushner-MBS Connection

Central to the deal’s political dimension is the well-documented relationship between Jared Kushner and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, which was forged during Kushner’s tenure as a senior White House advisor.16 This connection is widely seen as a key factor behind PIF’s $2 billion investment in Affinity Partners and is critical to understanding Kushner’s role in the EA acquisition. Critics argue this dynamic transforms established political networks into direct financial influence, blurring the lines between public service and private gain.16

Regulatory Hurdles and Political Influence

The transaction must secure approval from U.S. national security regulators, most notably the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which reviews foreign acquisitions of American companies for potential national security risks.2 The presence of Jared Kushner in the consortium fundamentally alters the calculus of this review. The transaction places a major American cultural and technological asset under the influence of a foreign sovereign wealth fund, a classic case of economic interdependence. However, Kushner’s role transforms this into a potential case of

weaponized interdependence. His unique position as a politically exposed person with deep ties to both the foreign investor (PIF) and the highest levels of the U.S. government allows him to leverage his political capital to navigate a regulatory process that would normally scrutinize such a deal with extreme prejudice. There is a prevailing view that Kushner’s involvement, particularly given his father-in-law Donald Trump’s favorable disposition toward Saudi investment, could significantly ease the path to regulatory approval.2 This raises serious concerns about potential “regulatory capture,” where the outcome of the review could be unduly influenced by political connections rather than an impartial assessment of the national interest, setting a dangerous precedent for future transactions involving sensitive cultural assets.

The Cultural Fault Line: Player Reaction and the Future of EA’s Worlds

The announcement of the acquisition has created a significant cultural fault line, sparking widespread backlash from the gaming community and raising fundamental questions about the future creative direction of EA’s most cherished franchises.

Widespread Negative Reaction

Initial reactions from across the gaming world—including journalists, content creators, developers, and players—have been described as “mostly negative,” characterized by a mixture of “shock and dismay”.5 This immediate and visceral opposition presents a significant reputational challenge for the new ownership from the outset and signals a deep-seated mistrust of the consortium’s motives and values.

Fears of Censorship and Ideological Influence

A primary driver of this backlash is the fear of censorship and the imposition of the new owners’ conservative ideologies on game content. This concern is particularly acute for franchises like The Sims, Mass Effect, and Dragon Age, which have been lauded for their progressive themes and inclusive representation of LGBTQ+ characters and relationships.7 Given that same-sex relationships are illegal and cannot be depicted in media in Saudi Arabia, fans are deeply worried that this inclusive content—a core part of these games’ identities—will be sanitized, curtailed, or removed entirely to align with the cultural sensibilities of the new ownership.7

This creates an unavoidable and inherent conflict. Electronic Arts, for all its corporate criticisms, oversees studios like BioWare and Maxis that have built their brands and cultivated loyal communities based on principles of player expression, choice, and inclusive storytelling. The new ownership, particularly PIF, represents a source of capital rooted in a socio-political system with values that are often diametrically opposed to the themes celebrated in these games. This is not merely a change of shareholders; it is a potential collision of worldviews at the highest level of the company. The long-term risk extends beyond the alteration of a single game’s content to the potential erosion of the creative soul of these key studios. If developers known for pushing cultural boundaries feel constrained, either by direct mandate or through a “chilling effect” of self-censorship, it could precipitate a talent exodus, a decline in creative quality, and the permanent alienation of the core audiences that made these franchises global phenomena.28

Financial Pressures on Game Design

Player concerns are further amplified by the financial realities of the LBO. The immense pressure to service the $20 billion debt will almost certainly compel EA to “double down on our biggest opportunities,” as stated by company leadership.13 In practice, this means an intensified focus on proven, high-margin formulas: annual sports titles, live-service games with recurring revenue streams, and aggressive monetization strategies.13 This strategic direction, dictated by financial necessity, could come at the expense of investment in riskier, narrative-driven single-player games or new, unproven IP—the very types of experiences many players crave. This threatens to exacerbate existing player frustrations with what are often perceived as predatory microtransaction models, further damaging the relationship between the company and its customers.12

Outlook and Strategic Scenarios

The landmark acquisition of Electronic Arts sets the stage for a complex and uncertain future. The interplay between the immense financial pressures of the LBO, the geopolitical objectives of its principal investor, and the unique creative culture of the company gives rise to several plausible strategic scenarios.

Scenario A: The Cash Cow Maximization

Driven by the imperative to service its $20 billion debt, the consortium could prioritize short-term cash flow above all other considerations. In this scenario, EA’s corporate strategy would become hyper-focused on its most profitable and reliable franchises: EA Sports FC, Madden NFL, and the live-service ecosystem of Apex Legends. Investment in new, creatively ambitious, or niche IP—particularly single-player games without recurring monetization—would be significantly curtailed. Monetization strategies within existing games would likely become more aggressive to maximize revenue per user. This approach would be the most direct path to satisfying creditors and generating returns for the private equity owners, but it would risk creative stagnation, brand erosion, and further alienation of the core gaming community.

Scenario B: The Soft Power Showcase

Alternatively, the consortium, guided by PIF’s strategic goal of “games-washing” and enhancing Saudi Arabia’s global image, could prioritize prestige over immediate profit. In this scenario, the new owners would invest heavily in high-profile, critically acclaimed projects designed to generate positive public relations and showcase technological prowess. This might involve reviving beloved but dormant franchises or funding ambitious new titles from renowned developers. While this could result in higher-quality games, they would likely be developed under subtle but firm content guidelines to ensure that no themes or narratives directly contradict Saudi cultural or political sensibilities. The result would be a portfolio of high-budget, technically impressive, but ultimately sanitized entertainment.

Scenario C: The Culture Clash and Decline

This scenario envisions a future where the inherent ideological conflict between the new ownership and the creative culture of EA’s key studios proves unmanageable. Faced with perceived or explicit censorship and a corporate focus that devalues their work, key creative talent from studios like BioWare and Maxis could depart en masse. The resulting decline in product quality, combined with sustained player boycotts and negative press, could cause irreparable damage to the franchises.29 The internal turmoil and reputational harm could ultimately outweigh the financial benefits, leading the consortium to dismantle the company and sell off its valuable IP to recoup its investment.

Final Assessment

The most probable future for Electronic Arts under its new ownership is a hybrid of the “Cash Cow Maximization” and “Soft Power Showcase” scenarios. The consortium will likely impose strict financial discipline and a focus on monetization for the core revenue-generating pillars of the business, such as EA Sports. Simultaneously, it will selectively fund high-profile “showcase” projects that serve PIF’s broader soft power objectives. The ultimate success or failure of this historic and controversial acquisition will depend entirely on the new owners’ ability to navigate the treacherous and often contradictory demands of financial pressure, political ambition, and the deeply ingrained creative culture of the interactive entertainment industry.

Sources des citations

  1. Video game publisher Electronic Arts to go private in record $55 billion buyout, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.businesstoday.in/technology/news/story/video-game-publisher-electronic-arts-to-go-private-in-record-55-billion-buyout-496252-2025-09-30
  2. Video gamer Electronic Arts to be bought in largest-ever private equity buyout valued at $55 billion, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/ea-electronic-arts-video-game-silver-lake-pif-d17dc7dd3412a990d2c0a6758aaa6900
  3. Electronic Arts Agrees to $55 Billion Buyout During Gaming Slump – YouTube, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfeQnXhwYa0
  4. Jared Kushner And Silver Lake To Acquire EA Sports In $55 Billion Mega-Deal – YouTube, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3S59sDGqzyc
  5. Saudi fund, Kushner’s firm to buy games maker Electronic Arts in $55bn deal – Al Jazeera, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/30/saudi-fund-kushners-firm-to-buy-games-maker-electronic-arts-in-55bn-deal
  6. EA Announces Agreement to be Acquired by PIF … – Electronic Arts, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://news.ea.com/press-releases/press-releases-details/2025/EA-Announces-Agreement-to-be-Acquired-by-PIF-Silver-Lake-and-Affinity-Partners-for-55-Billion/default.aspx
  7. Jared Kushner and Saudis take EA Games private in a massive deal. Trump connection under spotlight, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/us-news-jared-kushner-and-saudis-take-ea-games-private-electronic-arts-in-a-massive-deal-trump-connection-under-spotlight/articleshow/124215850.cms
  8. Video gamer Electronic Arts to be bought in largest-ever private equity buyout valued at $55 billion, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://indianexpress.com/article/technology/tech-news-technology/video-gamer-electronic-arts-to-be-bought-in-largest-ever-private-equity-buyout-valued-at-55-billion-10279571/
  9. EA announces $55 billion acquisition by PIF, Silver Lake and Affinity Partners, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://esportsinsider.com/2025/09/ea-acquisition-pif-silver-lake-affinity-partners
  10. EA Agrees to $55 Billion Leveraged Buyout – YouTube, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_LulRzMEMQ
  11. Electronic Arts to be acquired and taken private for record $55 billion – MLQ.ai | Stocks, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://mlq.ai/news/electronic-arts-to-be-acquired-and-taken-private-for-record-55-billion/
  12. How Electronic Arts’ $55 billion go-private deal could impact the video game industry, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/electronic-arts-buyout-what-to-know-ea6d403811e6ebab0b96ab772f5e7d67
  13. The EA Sale Is Bad News For Everyone – Aftermath, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://aftermath.site/the-ea-sale-is-bad-news-for-everyone
  14. EA to go private in $55 billion buyout: Silver Lake, PIF, and Affinity Partners lead historic deal; ends 36-year public listing, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/ea-to-go-private-in-55-billion-buyout-silver-lake-pif-and-affinity-partners-lead-historic-deal-ends-36-year-public-listing/articleshow/124214457.cms
  15. Exciting news about our future – EA, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.ea.com/news/exciting-news-about-our-future
  16. Who bought EA? | GamesIndustry.biz, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.gamesindustry.biz/who-bought-ea
  17. Electronic Arts nears $50 billion buyout by Saudi Arabia and Jared Kushner’s firm, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://mashable.com/article/electronic-arts-buyout-silver-lake-saudi-arabia-jared-kushner
  18. Who is Jared Kushner, Trump’s Son-in-law Tied to $55 Billion EA Sports Deal? – INDmoney, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.indmoney.com/blog/us-stocks/who-is-jared-kushner-trumps-son-in-law-tied-to-55-billion-ea-sports-deal
  19. EA may go private in one of largest buyout deals ever worth $50 billion, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/gaming/ea-may-go-private-in-one-of-largest-buyout-deals-ever-worth-50-billion/articleshow/124209520.cms
  20. Jared Kushner Joins Investors in $55B Deal to Buy Video Game Company Behind The Sims, Madden and More – People.com, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://people.com/jared-kushner-joins-investors-in-usd55b-deal-to-buy-video-game-company-behind-the-sims-madden-nfl-and-more-11821033
  21. EA announces agreement to be acquired by PIF, Silver Lake, and Affinity Partners for $55 billion | Public Investment Fund, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.pif.gov.sa/en/news-and-insights/newswire/2025/ea-announces-agreement-to-be-acquired-by-pif-silver-lake-and-affinity-partners-for-55-billion-usd/
  22. Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner leads $55B Saudi-backed buyout of EA Sports, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/jared-kushner-trump-saudi-ea-sports-b2835841.html
  23. EA CEO says company values will ‘remain unchanged’ under the new ownership of Saudi Arabia and Jared Kushner’s investment firm | PC Gamer, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/ea-ceo-says-company-values-will-remain-unchanged-under-the-new-ownership-of-saudi-arabia-and-jared-kushners-investment-firm/
  24. Video game maker Electronic Arts to be acquired and taken private for $55 billion – PBS, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/video-game-maker-electronic-arts-to-be-acquired-and-taken-private-for-55-billion
  25. Saudi-led fund to buy EA Games in $55bn deal – The Cradle, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://thecradle.co/articles-id/33415
  26. Electronic Arts acquisition by private equity sparks more uncertainty for Canadian gaming industry | CBC News, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/ea-acquisition-uncertainty-gaming-1.7646563
  27. Am I the only person who is terrified by Jared Kushner and the Saudi Arabian royal family buying EA? : r/saltierthankrayt – Reddit, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/saltierthankrayt/comments/1ntjlcw/am_i_the_only_person_who_is_terrified_by_jared/
  28. “Gaming giant Electronic Arts bought in unprecedented $55bn deal” (…) “The consortium of buyers include Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), Silver Lake and Jared Kushner’s Affinity Partners.” : r/behindthebastards – Reddit, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/behindthebastards/comments/1ntkp5m/gaming_giant_electronic_arts_bought_in/
  29. $55 billion EA buyout hands Madden over to investors including Saudi Arabia and Jared Kushner : r/technology – Reddit, consulté le septembre 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1nth8t7/55_billion_ea_buyout_hands_madden_over_to/